Explosive Leaked Testimony Unveils D4VD Tour Manager’s Shocking Admission: “I Didn’t Feel Responsible to Call Police” – Inside the High-Stakes Investigation Surrounding Celeste Rivas’s Tragic Death and the Profound Implications for Accountability in the Music Industry as Prosecutors Explore Dark Secrets of Tour Life and Possible Cover-Up by Those Closest to the Star, Raising Questions About Legal Duty and Morality in the Wake of a Young Girl’s Demise.

A leaked account of grand jury testimony has revealed a shocking admission from the inner circle of music star D4VD, as the investigation into the death of teenager Celeste Rivas intensifies. Robert Morgan Roth, the president of D4VD’s touring company and general manager of his record label, testified he did not feel responsible for calling police after a crisis, choosing instead to “continue with the tour.”

 

The testimony, overheard by multiple individuals in a courthouse hallway and reported by TMZ, places D4VD’s closest associates directly under the grand jury’s scrutiny. Roth, who also lived with the artist, was reportedly grilled for hours by Deputy District Attorney Beth Silverman, who pressed him aggressively on his failure to contact authorities.

 

This development marks a pivotal escalation in the high-profile case, signaling prosecutors are meticulously examining the actions of everyone around D4VD in the timeline surrounding Rivas’s death. The 17-year-old’s body was discovered in September inside a Tesla registered to D4VD, parked near a Los Angeles mansion he was renting.

 

Legal experts suggest Roth’s stated rationale could carry significant legal peril. His admission implies prior knowledge of a serious incident, yet a conscious decision was made to prioritize the singer’s tour schedule over alerting law enforcement. This directly contradicts standard legal duty-to-report protocols.

 

The context of the tour is now a critical focus. D4VD was on the American leg of a concert tour when Rivas’s body was found. The international segment was slated to begin shortly after, a career milestone for the artist. Roth’s comment suggests business continuity was paramount at a moment prosecutors believe demanded emergency intervention.

 

Further compounding the gravity of the testimony is Roth’s dual role as tour manager and housemate. Neighbors have previously stated they observed Rivas living at the property, meaning Roth would have been in a position to note her presence, her subsequent disappearance, and her underage status.

This leak intensifies scrutiny on early statements from the Los Angeles Police Department, which initially suggested an overdose before the medical examiner’s official findings. The grand jury’s pointed questioning of Roth indicates investigators are probing whether D4VD’s camp propagated that narrative to deflect criminal liability.

 

The revelation also fuels speculation that authorities believe D4VD did not act alone. Law enforcement sources have previously hinted at multiple individuals being involved in the events following Rivas’s death. Roth’s testimony and his integral role in the singer’s professional and personal life place him squarely in that orbit.

 

Questions now center on the specific incident to which Roth was referring. Prosecutors appear to be establishing a timeline where those closest to D4VD became aware of a catastrophic event involving Celeste Rivas but orchestrated a cover-up to protect the lucrative tour.

 

The grand jury is tasked with determining whether there is probable cause to indict anyone for a crime related to Rivas’s death. Roth’s testimony provides a rare, unfiltered glimpse into the prosecution’s strategy, which seems to be building a case of conspiracy and obstruction after the fact.

Rivas’s inability to obtain a passport for the international tour without parental consent provides another crucial piece of context. Her age would have made her travel impossible, potentially creating a motive for those dependent on D4VD’s success to remove a complicating factor.

 

The leaked hallway conversation underscores the immense pressure surrounding the case. For Roth to be overheard discussing his testimony suggests a level of stress and frustration within D4VD’s camp as the legal net tightens. The district attorney’s office has made justice for Celeste Rivas a public priority.

 

This testimony directly challenges the potential defense that those around D4VD were unaware of any wrongdoing. By admitting he considered calling police but chose not to, Roth has introduced a conscious, deliberate choice into the official record, one a jury may interpret as evidence of guilt.

 

The focus on duty of care is particularly damning. If prosecutors can prove Roth aided in housing a minor, procuring false identification, or facilitating her access to adult environments, they could argue he assumed a legal responsibility for her welfare that he blatantly violated.

As the grand jury continues to hear evidence, this leak confirms the investigation is reaching its most sensitive phase. Key insiders are being compelled to account for their actions under oath, with their words potentially forming the foundation of a major criminal indictment.

 

The music industry is watching closely, aware that a successful prosecution could redefine accountability for entourages surrounding young stars. The era of handlers insulating artists from consequences may be facing a formidable legal challenge in a Los Angeles courtroom.

 

For the family of Celeste Rivas, the leaked testimony represents a painful but significant step toward accountability. It transforms vague speculation into a concrete allegation: that a grown man, entrusted with coordination and care, felt no responsibility to report a tragedy involving a child.

 

The international tour Roth referenced never commenced. D4VD’s career is in hiatus, his reputation entangled in a grim mystery. The pursuit of that tour, according to the grand jury’s line of questioning, may have come at an unimaginable cost.

 

All eyes now turn to the district attorney’s office, awaiting a decision on indictments. The public account of Robert Morgan Roth’s testimony has irrevocably shifted the narrative, painting a picture of calculated negligence in the shadow of a young girl’s death. The breaking point in the D4VD case may have just arrived.